2ND ANNUAL FREENET CONFERENCE OPENS IN OTTAWA Pierre Bourque
      Realtime Online Ottawa 10:25 a.m., August 15th, 1994 National
      Capital Freenet President Dave Sutherland opened the second
      annual Canadian Community Networks Conference today. There
      are over 130 participants from all over Canada. He mentioned
      that the current online freenet population in Canada now
      numbers between 30-40,000. He forecasts that between
      300-400,000 will be online this time next year. The purpose
      of the conference is to allow participants to learn from each
      other and to help transplant enthusiasm throughout Canada for
      Freenet. He also reminded participants that this conference
      will see the birth of a new freenet umbrella group,
      Telecommunities Canada. Sutherland then introduced Hart
      Davis, from the Information Highway Advisory Council
      Secretariat. Davis made the point that Freenets are about
      people, not technology....regardless of income or
      technological abilities. Participants should not lose sight
      of that, and he called it "The Freenet Promise". Garth Graham
      bounded up to the podium next. He's the Conference Program
      Coordinator and explained some of the procedures that will
      need to be followed during the conference, including the
      establishment of a Telecommunities Canada Board of Directors.
      He then declared the nomination period to be officially open,
      and explained that bethween 7 and 15 members of the Board are
      required. He also announced that email and telnet facilities
      are available onsite for conference participants. Rosaleen
      Dickson was up next. She explained that a reporting system
      had been established to provide realtime online reports which
      would be available via freenet and the internet. ***Keynote
      Speaker*** Mark Surman - writer, media critic, community
      television production teacher and information activist - "
      Social axtivism and the electronic commons: from community
      television to freenets." Surman asked participants to compare
      the relative success of community television as it applies to
      the concept of the electronic commons. And whether or not
      freenets should follow that path towards achieving some
      semblance to the mythical concept of open public self
      expression. If freenets are to be the modern era commons for
      expression, certain principles will define electronic public
      space. 1- Free and open access 2- There should be a two way
      flow of information 3- Care to ensure an accessible level of
      computer and technological literacy to ensure that we are not
      shutting off whole sectors of society 4- There must be
      non-commercial spaces for the electronic commons 5- it should
      be funded by the people who own the network system. Community
      television had similar goals at it's inception. Today, it
      suffers from lack of interest by social groups and agencies,
      low level professionalism, limitation of things that get
      covered due to the complex nature of producing television
      programming. Amateurs find the exercise prohibitive. There is
      also a growing sponsorship revenue addiction and a subtle
      influence of commercial interests on programming. He
      recommends that freenets encourage localness. He suggests
      that responsibility of content should lie with the writer on
      freenet and not with the system as it does with cable
      companies. He feels that cable company responsibility has
      impeded expression. Surman believes there is an important
      place for freenet discussion within the context of the
      overall information highway debate. He recommends that much
      time be spent on the design of the system wetware , not
      hardware. If the info highway and the electronic commons is
      to lead to empowerement, we must go beyond the mere
      electronic discussion. He also quoted Mitch Kapor of the EFF
      from a recent Wired magazine article whereby Kapor defined
      the broadcast model as limited, and one which fostered
      consumerism, passism and mediocrity. And where the Internet
      model was decentralized, and fostered critical thinking,
      democracy and equality. One which would breed a better
      society. -- Realtime Online - Professional Conference
      Reporting Team Rosaleen Dickson, Ottawa
      ac174@freenet.carleton.ca. Pierre Bourque, Michel Careau,
      Shady Kanfi, Charles King, Andrea Kujala, Jules Lafrance,
      Bruce MacDonald, Robt Rattey, Natalie Roth, Michael
      Silvestrini, Stephen Toy.